Sex & the Minister
By: Law Kim Hwee
I address this blog to my fellow younger citizens, Singaporeans of my children’s generation, born in the 1990’s. “Sex in small places” concerns them. Beyond the funny responses and factual criticisms is a bigger issue at stake – the mindsetof the ministers they vote for, whose thinking will influence their future, their lives. It’s much more than just sex and is surely no small matter.
Josephine Teo had all the time in the world to reply to the “question on whether young people are not getting their flats early enough to have children.” But with a straight face, Mrs Teo declared:
She cannot try to wiggle her way out by claiming that her reported words “might not have captured everything in the way I intended.” And, now, wants to switch to “an honest conversation on how, as a society, we can get ready for Millennial family.” Unless, of course, she’s (Alice in Wonderland) Humpty Dumpty, “When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.” Nope. ‘You need a very small space to have sex’ is basic subject-verb-object English with simple words whose meaning is clear enough. So, no, no, no. Don’t change the subject. Cannot! Aside from the avalanche of responses directly engaging her “sex in small spaces”, the more relevant question, themindset issue is, “What informs such a cheeky, cavalier, condescending reply from a senior minister?” Or, what guides her to reply with the words she did? To uncover what’s behind her reply, we just need to ask her a simple question: “Would Josephine Teo tell that to her own three children, would she?” It’s highly unlikely, if not rather obvious, that as a mother, she would not tell that her own children. So, why is she dishing out such advice to our millennial citizens? Because “sex in small places” applies and is good enough for little people, for peasants. The retort is similar in vein to another minister asking, “Do you want three meals in a hawker centre, food court or restaurant?” It’s pompous and patronizing. But it’s how an ‘actsy-borak’ airhead would talk to those she considers to be beneath her station in life, simpletons, peasants. So, “sex in small places” reveals a mindset that thinks… While our children have sex; They, the elites’ offspring, well, they make love. While our children must make do with a very small area; They, their elites’ offspring get a new condo with their S$mil salary in a year. While our children have to put up in their parents’ HDB 4-roomer; They, their elites’ offspring are gifted a new wing in their bungalow. And while to us they preach the virtues of self-reliance; They, the elites, well, they get to practise self-actualization. My fellow younger citizens, you and your lives are no more than a problem for the PAP ministers to solve, to social-experiment. You are a digit, a number in their statistics game, another brick in the wall. You can either believe Josephine’s doublespeak, “In this day and age, it is not possible for us to say that you are somehow bad, you are not doing your part for society”. Or, you can put the pieces of how she and her colleagues have been talking down to, patronizing us on various matters to form the consistent picture of who they really are, what they think of us. They reveal their true selves unconsciously, inadvertently, unintentionally by how they answer to our concerns. For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks . The truth, my young friends, is they want to mould you into happy idiots….“You need a very small space to have sex.”
So, Josephine, would you tell your own children, your colleagues’ children, “You need a very small space to have sex”? Would you? If not, why say that to our children? -- Republished from the blog '2econdsight'.I’m going to find myself a girl Who can show me what laughter means And we’ll fill in the missing colors In each other’s paint-by-number dreams And then we’ll put our dark glasses on Have ‘sex in small places’* until our strength is gone And when the morning light comes streaming in We’ll get up and do it again Get it up again
I’m going to be a happy idiot And struggle for the legal tender Where the ads take aim and lay their claim To the heart and the soul of the spender And believe in whatever may lie In those things that money can buy Though true love could have been a contender Are you there? Say a prayer for the Pretender Who started out so young and strong Only to surrender …Jackson Browne, 1976, (* with apologies)
Enjoying this article?
Subscribe to get more stories like this delivered to your inbox.
Tags
PAP
The Independent
Contributing writer at The Independent Singapore